• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Productivity and Development
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 30 (2025)
Volume Volume 29 (2024)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 28 (2023)
Volume Volume 27 (2022)
Volume Volume 26 (2021)
Volume Volume 25 (2020)
Volume Volume 24 (2019)
Volume Volume 23 (2018)
Volume Volume 22 (2017)
Volume Volume 21 (2016)
Volume Volume 20 (2015)
Volume Volume 19 (2014)
Volume Volume 18 (2013)
Volume Volume 17 (2012)
Volume Volume 16 (2011)
Volume Volume 15 (2010)
Volume Volume 14 (2009)
Volume Volume 13 (2008)
Volume Volume 12 (2007)
Volume Volume 11 (2006)
El-Gammal, ., Hasan, E., Hassan, A., Nada, R. (2024). RESPONSE OF WHEAT YIELD TO SOME SOIL AMENDMENTS UNDER IRRIGATION WITH SALINE WATER. Journal of Productivity and Development, 29(4), 255-279. doi: 10.21608/jpd.2024.387416
ِAshraf El-Gammal; El-Sayed Hasan; Aly Hassan; Ragab Nada. "RESPONSE OF WHEAT YIELD TO SOME SOIL AMENDMENTS UNDER IRRIGATION WITH SALINE WATER". Journal of Productivity and Development, 29, 4, 2024, 255-279. doi: 10.21608/jpd.2024.387416
El-Gammal, ., Hasan, E., Hassan, A., Nada, R. (2024). 'RESPONSE OF WHEAT YIELD TO SOME SOIL AMENDMENTS UNDER IRRIGATION WITH SALINE WATER', Journal of Productivity and Development, 29(4), pp. 255-279. doi: 10.21608/jpd.2024.387416
El-Gammal, ., Hasan, E., Hassan, A., Nada, R. RESPONSE OF WHEAT YIELD TO SOME SOIL AMENDMENTS UNDER IRRIGATION WITH SALINE WATER. Journal of Productivity and Development, 2024; 29(4): 255-279. doi: 10.21608/jpd.2024.387416

RESPONSE OF WHEAT YIELD TO SOME SOIL AMENDMENTS UNDER IRRIGATION WITH SALINE WATER

Article 4, Volume 29, Issue 4, October 2024, Page 255-279  XML PDF (1 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpd.2024.387416
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
ِAshraf El-Gammal1; El-Sayed Hasan* 2; Aly Hassan2; Ragab Nada2
1Soils, Water and Environment Res. Inst., Agric. Res. Center, Egypt.
2Plant Production Dept., Fac. Technology & Development. Zagazig University, Egypt.
Abstract
Field experiments were conducted in two winter successive seasons (2020-2021 and 2021-2022) at the Soil Improvement and Conservation Research Department, Sakha Agricultural Research Station, Kafr Elsheikh Governorate. Egypt (located 6 meters above sea level, with latitude of 31° 05' 38" N and longitude of 30° 56' 53" E) The experiments aimed to evaluate the response of wheat yield and its components as well as some soil properties to some soil amendments i. e. fulvic acid (FA) and phosphogypsum (PG) under irrigation conditions that using irrigation saline water. A split-plot design with three replications was applied; six salinity levels of irrigation water were applied in the main plots, while three soil amendments including (without amendment, FA and PG) were tested in the sub-plots.
The results revealed that increasing irrigation water salinity led to significant reductions in wheat plant height, spike length, and 1000-grain weight, while the application of FA and PG mitigated these effects, enhancing these growth parameters. Similarly, grain yield, straw yield, and biological yield significantly decreased with higher salinity levels but were improved with the application of FA and PG The nutrient content (N, P, and K) in wheat plant grain also decreased with increased salinity but improved with the use of FA and PG.The relationships between grain yield as well as straw yield and salinity levels under some amendments were expressed in six equations namely:
Grain yield:
Linear:    GYL = 2800 – 66.207x                              R2 = 0.9385
Quadratic: GYQ =2741.1  -16.062x   -6.0098x2       R2 = 09681
Straw yield:
Linear :SYL = 3508.1-154.28x                                 R2 = 0.9611
Quadratic: SY Q =  3506.1  - 152.59 x  -0.2024 x2     R2 = 0.9611
 
Where: GYL , GYQ, SYL  and SYS,   are the grain and straw  yield (kgfed-1)for linear and quadratic relationship under irrigation water salinity,  x is irrigation water salinity level (dSm-1).
These fitted equations indicated that with respect to grain yield PG is more effective at lower salinity levels (below 6.59 dS/m), while FA is preferable at higher salinity levels (above 6.59 dS/m), however, resulting in a yield reduction Moreover, the results revealed that increasing irrigation water salinity led to significant reductions in wheat plant height, spike length, and 1000-grain weight, while the application of FA and PG mitigated these effects, enhancing these growth parameters. The nutrient content (N, P, and K) in wheat plant grain also decreased with increased salinity but improved with the use of FA and PG. emphasizing the critical importance of managing salinity and soil amendments for optimal wheat productivity.
Conclusively, from the fitted equations of the relationships between grain yield and salinity levels under some amendments the study indicated that PG is more effective at lower salinity levels (below 6.59 dS/m), while FA is preferable at higher salinity levels (above 6.59 dS/m)..
 
Keywords
Irrigation water salinity; PG; FA; amendments and wheat productivity
Statistics
Article View: 114
PDF Download: 151
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.