• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Productivity and Development
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 30 (2025)
Volume Volume 29 (2024)
Volume Volume 28 (2023)
Volume Volume 27 (2022)
Volume Volume 26 (2021)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 25 (2020)
Volume Volume 24 (2019)
Volume Volume 23 (2018)
Volume Volume 22 (2017)
Volume Volume 21 (2016)
Volume Volume 20 (2015)
Volume Volume 19 (2014)
Volume Volume 18 (2013)
Volume Volume 17 (2012)
Volume Volume 16 (2011)
Volume Volume 15 (2010)
Volume Volume 14 (2009)
Volume Volume 13 (2008)
Volume Volume 12 (2007)
Volume Volume 11 (2006)
El- Metwaly, H. (2021). RESPONSE OF YIELD AND QUALITY OF SWEET POTATO PLANTS TO IRRIGATION INTERVALS AND SOME SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATION TREATMENTS. Journal of Productivity and Development, 26(1), 61-95. doi: 10.21608/jpd.2021.141706
Hamada El- Metwaly. "RESPONSE OF YIELD AND QUALITY OF SWEET POTATO PLANTS TO IRRIGATION INTERVALS AND SOME SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATION TREATMENTS". Journal of Productivity and Development, 26, 1, 2021, 61-95. doi: 10.21608/jpd.2021.141706
El- Metwaly, H. (2021). 'RESPONSE OF YIELD AND QUALITY OF SWEET POTATO PLANTS TO IRRIGATION INTERVALS AND SOME SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATION TREATMENTS', Journal of Productivity and Development, 26(1), pp. 61-95. doi: 10.21608/jpd.2021.141706
El- Metwaly, H. RESPONSE OF YIELD AND QUALITY OF SWEET POTATO PLANTS TO IRRIGATION INTERVALS AND SOME SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATION TREATMENTS. Journal of Productivity and Development, 2021; 26(1): 61-95. doi: 10.21608/jpd.2021.141706

RESPONSE OF YIELD AND QUALITY OF SWEET POTATO PLANTS TO IRRIGATION INTERVALS AND SOME SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATION TREATMENTS

Article 4, Volume 26, Issue 1, January 2021, Page 61-95  XML PDF (823.77 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jpd.2021.141706
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Hamada El- Metwaly email
Potato and Vegetatively Propagated Vegetables Dept. Hort. Res. Inst., Agric. Res. Center, Giza, Egypt.
Abstract
A field experiment was carried out during the two successive  summer  seasons of 2019 and 2020 in a Private Farm at Meet Faris Village, Dekarns, District  Dakhlia  Governorate, Egypt to study the effect of irrigation intervals  (15 and 30 days) and  some  soil application treatments  (humic acid at 20 kg /fad. and fulvic acid at 10 kg/fad.) and foliar  application treatments (without,  trehalose at 1 g/l,  potassium silicate at 1ml/l and algae extract at 1g/l)  on growth, plant water relationships,  yield and its components as well as  tuber roots quality of sweet potato plants cv. Beauregard grown  under clay soil conditions  using  follow  irrigation system .
The obtained results showed that,  the interaction  treatment between irrigation sweet potato plants cv Beauregard grown in clay soil during summer seasons conditions every 15 or 30 days and treated plants with fulvic acid  at 10 kg /fad. as soil application  + spraying  with  potassium silicate  at 1 ml/l  increased main vine  length , both fresh and dry weight of shoots/ plant, average tuber root weight , total yield/fad.  and K contents  in tuber roots.  In addition, the interaction between   irrigation every 15 and treating with fulvic acid at 10 kg /fad. as soil application+ foliar spray with potassium silicate at 1 ml/l increased number of branches/plant, marketable yield  and total carbohydrates  in tuber roots. Also  the  plants  grown under the same irrigation intervals (every 15 days)  and treating with fulvic acid  at 10 kg /fad.+  spraying with trehalose at 1 g/l  significantly increased total , free water  in leaf  tissues  , however  , the interaction between  irrigation  every 15 days intervals  and treating with  fulvic acid  at  10 kg /fad. as soil application+  spraying with  algae extract  at 1 g/l increased N and P in shoots and tuber roots as well as  tuber root diameter.  On the other hand,  the interaction between irrigation every 30 days  and treated plants  with FA at 10 kg /fad.+ spraying  with potassium silicate  at 1 ml/l  increased  K contents in shoots , tuber root length and dry matter contents in tuber roots. The interaction between irrigation every 30 days  and treating with  humic acid only at 20 kg /fad increased  bound water (%) , osmotic pressure  and proline amino acid  in leaves  of sweet potato in both growing seasons
Conclusively, it could be concluded that, irrigation sweet potato plants grown in clay soil during summer seasons every 15 or 30 days  and treated plants with  fulvic acid  at 10 kg /fad. soil application + spraying with  potassium silicate  at 1 ml/l or  with algae extract  or  trehalose at 1 g/l of each to obtain high  productivity  and  best  tuber root quality.
 
Keywords
Sweet potato; irrigation intervals; humic & fulvic acid; trehalose; potassium silicate; growth; plant water
Supplementary Files
download Table 26.1.4, potato.pdf
Statistics
Article View: 401
PDF Download: 950
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.